*

*
Bengals
Mark Curnutte offers the latest on the Cincinnati Bengals


Mark Curnutte started covering the Bengals and the NFL for The Enquirer in 2000. He previously wrote about urban affairs and other social issues for the Enquirer. He won the prestigious 1994 Unity Award from Lincoln University (Missouri) for "A Polite Silence," a seven-day series about race relations in Greater Cincinnati. He also has worked as an assistant features editor and features writer at The News & Observer in Raleigh, N.C. Curnutte is second vice president and a three-year board member of the Professional Football Writers of America (PFWA). He is a 1984 Miami University graduate.

Powered by Blogger

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Big hairy deal

PALM BEACH, Fla. -- One of the most frivolous items on the agenda for the NFL meeting this week is getting the most attention.

It is the Kansas City Chiefs’ proposal to prohibit players’ hair from obstructing their nameplate of jersey number.

Kansas City will present the proposal Tuesday morning. Player safety is believed to be a part of the proposal.

“I know we got into the whole issue many years ago, when we went through the skull cap vs. bandanna, and I don’t remember safety playing into that, but I think this (proposal) is different,” said Falcons president Rich McKay, co-chair of the competition committee.

“I don’t want to speak for them, but I don’t think they’re intending for someone to cut their hair.”

Several NFL players, including an increasing number of Samoans who celebrate their heritage, wear their hair long and flowing from beneath their helmets.

Bengals defensive lineman Jonathan Fanene and Domata Peko, like Steelers safety Troy Polamalu, have Samoan roots.

Peko’s bushy mane does cover his nameplate and partially obstructs his No. 94.

"I’m going to do whatever they want,” Peko said tonight. “But it will be a disappointment to me and other Samoan players. It is part of our culture."

Bengals wide receiver T.J. Houshmandzadeh has worn a pony tail while on the field.
The competition committee has discussed hair previously.

"There was this concern, were you allowed to tackle them?” McKay said. “And we said yes. You can’t have a guy who grabs up there and gets a penalty because he grabs hair."

QUESTION: What do you think of the hair issue? Much ado about nothing? A good idea?

Elsewhere on the agenda for the league meeting, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell will make his annual report to the 32 teams at 9 Monday morning.

Three executive sessions, with two members of each organization in attendance, will be held Monday, as well.

A proposal to re-seed teams for the playoffs, though interesting, doesn’t seem likely to pass. The four division winners in each the American and National conference get home games. The proposal, designed to give teams more to play for late in the season, would give just two division winners with the top records the automatic home games. Seeds 3-6 would be awarded to the teams with the best records, possibly giving a wildcard team a home game.


4 Comments:

at 3/30/2008 9:32 PM Blogger firefly118 said...

I think it is a good deal! Being an individual is fine, but being a team is fine too. What you do on your own time is your business, but remember, this is a job and these guys are the employees. There rules in every job, I can't wear my hair a certain way, or have facial hair, or wear my uniform in any fashion. This is life, and there are rules, don't like it, find another job.

As long as it is fair across the board, it is a good deal. The funny thing about it is, how many players complain that the players are not marketed like they should be (like other leagues)? Now they want to cover their names up!!! Doesn't make sense to me.

THE RULE I DON'T LIKE is the limited celebration. Yeah, we need some control, but let the guys celebrate and have fun, that is what keeps fans watching a lot of times.

 
at 3/30/2008 11:00 PM Blogger mentalmidget said...

I think the hair issue is a waste of time. If a player wants to expose his hair and take the risk of getting it yanked out of his head, THAT'S his business.
LOL! I think I'd like to see that on the highlights!
Seriously, is it a real big deal? Let it go. There hasn't a problem before. We are talking about grown men who know the risks!! Limited risks, at that! Doesn't the NFL have more important things to worry about?

 
at 3/31/2008 1:14 AM Blogger Unknown said...

I'm not sure what the current rule is about grabbing hair. I seem to remember it was a personal foul in recent history. That might have changed. I only care that players aren't penalized for grabbing hair. If a player wants to be stupid enough to have hair that can be yanked, that's his choice. I believe TJ tucks his pony-tail in, doesn't he?

 
at 3/31/2008 6:54 AM Blogger Carson said...

Frivolous is right...What rationale could they possibly have.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs


Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck

Advertisement