*

*
Bengals
Mark Curnutte offers the latest on the Cincinnati Bengals


Mark Curnutte started covering the Bengals and the NFL for The Enquirer in 2000. He previously wrote about urban affairs and other social issues for the Enquirer. He won the prestigious 1994 Unity Award from Lincoln University (Missouri) for "A Polite Silence," a seven-day series about race relations in Greater Cincinnati. He also has worked as an assistant features editor and features writer at The News & Observer in Raleigh, N.C. Curnutte is second vice president and a three-year board member of the Professional Football Writers of America (PFWA). He is a 1984 Miami University graduate.

Powered by Blogger

Sunday, October 07, 2007

First-quarter report card

The Bengals are 1-3 at the end of the first quarter of the season. The grades:

Pass offense: A-minus --With the running game sputtering at 83.3 yards a game, the Bengals are relying heavily on the pass. The team has 10 passing touchdowns but just one on the ground. Chad Johnson is second in the NFL with 495 yards, and T.J. Houshmandzadeh leads with 39 receptions. True, Palmer is forcing some balls, but it’s out of necessity. The Bengals are imbalanced offensively. The NFL average for pass plays is 56 percent. The Bengals are throwing the ball 64 percent of the time through four games (165 drop backs, 94 runs).

Run offense: D -- The stated preseason goal of improving the run game has not materialized. The Bengals are 26th in league, exactly where they were at the end of 2006. An injury to rookie Kenny Irons hurt, and it’s a fair question to ask if Rudi Johnson is finally wearing down. The offensive line is not blocking as well in the run game as it is for the pass.

Pass defense: F -- The Bengals have allowed 11 passing touchdowns, second most in the NFL to Cleveland’s 12. Cincinnati is 26th in pass defense at 251 yards a game and 28th in sacks per play with just four. Cornerback Johnathan Joseph appears to be playing hurt with the lingering effects of the foot stress fracture. Fellow corner Deltha O’Neal looks more like the 2006 model than the 2005 Pro Bowler.

Run defense: D -- With the inordinate number of injuries at linebacker, the Bengals are forced to play with safeties and ends as outside linebackers and a cast newcomers who were signed after training camp, a problem partially created by the front office. Despite the big number of yards and points allowed – 30th in yards at 403 and 31st in points at 31.7 – the Bengals are doing better on third down (tied for 17th at 42 percent).

Special teams: D (or I, for incomplete) -- The defensive injuries have devastated the coverage units, and special teams coach Darrin Simmons has been forced to work in new players every week. The coverage units – 24th against punt returns and 30th against kickoffs – played their best game in Week 4 against New England. But the week before in Seattle, the kicking game made three major mistakes that cost the game.

Coaching: D -- The Bengals needed six takeaways to win the opener against Baltimore. But the defense and special teams could not make one positive stop or big play at Cleveland. Marvin Lewis and Chuck Bresnahan’s defense shows no improvement in the past couple of seasons, though they would not use the injuries this year as an excuse, it is a partial explanation. The desired fast start did not happen, and the ultimate responsibility rest with Lewis for both game preparation and personnel decisions.


7 Comments:

at 10/07/2007 7:53 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gee Mark, since you seem to have all the answer to the Bengals problems maybe you should be coaching the team.

Sim

 
at 10/07/2007 10:03 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did anyone catch the score on the Bengals vs the Bye? Last I heard the defensive had given up 170 yards on the ground, 250 yards in the air against the Bye and that Dhani Jones was out with a pulled Hammy.

 
at 10/08/2007 8:37 AM Blogger Unknown said...

Actually Sim, he didn't offer any answers. He simply stated stats and apparent weaknesses, not how they would be able to overcome them.

 
at 10/08/2007 10:53 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

After reviewing your report card on the Bengals first quarter of the season it obvious that you still think you are a political reporter. To grade the coaching staff with a D is the same as saying, “Hey readers I would really tell you what is going on but I am afraid that The Bengals would not let me listen to the excuses that Marvin makes anymore”. As far as information provided, you sounded like a Bengal employee instead of a seeker and reporter of information. The coaching Grade of D is a demonstration of generosity on your part and the political correctness that only a social reporter would use. Thanks for your efforts but your grade on this article is less than satisfactory and continued sub- standard performance will lead to a sentence of listening to all of Marvin’s past post game press conferences.

 
at 10/08/2007 2:49 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mark,

I find your comments kind and yet accurate. However, I think it can all be summarized in a simple statement to fully capture the season thus far and for the remaining 12 weeks: The Bengals lost to the Browns. If we would just come to terms with that reality we'd stop holding onto hope and realize what we have. The fact is: We lost to the Browns. I guarantee you that no playoff teams highlight film will include a loss to the Browns.

We grade and speak of the future with such hope while ignoring reality: The Bengals lost to the Browns.

That says it all.

 
at 10/08/2007 4:45 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

these weaknesses are the same weaknesses that have plagued the bengals for a couple seasons now. i would like to see some moves by the front office to correct them instead of patching the leaks with used up, last ditch, end-of-their-career players or young affordable players that don't amount to much. the defense would be better if thurman and pollack would be able to play and the running game would be better if perry and irons were able to play but as a front office, you have to respond and work to fix these problems.

 
at 10/08/2007 6:08 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with the grade for the running game, but I don't think Rudi is breaking down at all. I think he is trying to become something he is not. He needs to get back to being a one-cut-hit-the-hole back. I put some of the blame on poor playcalling and some on the offensive line. It doesn't help our quick pulling guard is in Cleveland, the line hasn't performed well with the run or Rudi is trying to dance instead of hitting the hole.

Conditioning isn't the problem with Rudi. He needs to hit the hole hard.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs


Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck

Advertisement