*

*
Bengals
Mark Curnutte offers the latest on the Cincinnati Bengals


Mark Curnutte started covering the Bengals and the NFL for The Enquirer in 2000. He previously wrote about urban affairs and other social issues for the Enquirer. He won the prestigious 1994 Unity Award from Lincoln University (Missouri) for "A Polite Silence," a seven-day series about race relations in Greater Cincinnati. He also has worked as an assistant features editor and features writer at The News & Observer in Raleigh, N.C. Curnutte is second vice president and a three-year board member of the Professional Football Writers of America (PFWA). He is a 1984 Miami University graduate.

Powered by Blogger

Thursday, September 13, 2007

NFL disciplines Patriots

New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick has been fined the maximum amount under the NFL Constitution and By-Laws of $500,000 for violating league policy last Sunday on the use of equipment to videotape an opposing team’s offensive or defensive signals, the NFL announced today.

In addition, Commissioner Roger Goodell also notified the Patriots that they would forfeit their own first-round draft choice in 2008 if they reach the playoffs, or their own second-round and third-round picks if they do not qualify for the playoffs, and that the club would be fined $250,000.

"This episode represents a calculated and deliberate attempt to avoid longstanding rules designed to encourage fair play and promote honest competition on the playing field," Commissioner Goodell wrote in a letter to the Patriots.

NFL policy states that "no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches’ booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game" and that all video shooting locations for club coaching purposes "must be enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead."

In a memo to NFL head coaches and general managers on Sept. 6, 2006, NFL Executive Vice President of Football Operations Ray Anderson said, “Videotaping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent’s offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches’ booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game.”

In his review of the facts, Commissioner Goodell determined that the Patriots’ use last Sunday of the video camera, which was seized before the end of the first quarter, had no impact on the outcome of the Patriots-New York Jets game.

Goodell also believes that Patriots ownership was unaware of Belichick’s action, but determined that penalties should be imposed on the club because "Coach Belichick not only serves as the head coach but also has substantial control over all aspects of New England’s football operations. His actions and decisions are properly attributed to the club."

Commissioner Goodell informed the Patriots that the NFL would closely review and monitor the Patriots’ coaching video program, effective immediately.

"I specifically considered whether to impose a suspension on Coach Belichick," Goodell wrote. "I have determined not to do so, largely because I believe that the discipline I am imposing of a maximum fine and forfeiture of a first-round draft choice, or multiple draft choices, is in fact more significant and long-lasting, and therefore more effective, than a suspension."


7 Comments:

at 9/14/2007 12:34 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

my thoughts and the spoken on ESPN is why can a player get suspended for using performance enhancing drugs, but a coach doesnt get suspended for using "coaching enhancing products" like stealing these signs? Just doesnt make a whole lot of sense to me. Then again, I dont think the NFL wanted to punish the Golden Boys that much. Regardless, WHO DEY.

 
at 9/14/2007 1:02 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seems its ok to cheat because you only get a fine but if you happen to drink and drive (off the field) you lose out on an entire season? Seems in the pursuit to save the image of the game Goodell is willing to make a statement when it comes to players who have off field issues but NOT when it comes to coaches who cheat ON the field.

I think Goodell has his priorities a bit twisted on this one, Belichick should have been fined, and suspended for at least 4 games. He was given at least one warning.

 
at 9/14/2007 7:37 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let's see... Take money away from someone who doesn't need the money...And take draft picks away from a team that doesn't need the draft picks... meanwhile - THIS YEAR's TEAM will not suffer an impact from the penalty. This one does not make any sense.

 
at 9/14/2007 8:09 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have to disagree w/ the above posts. I think Godell has hurt the Pats going forward. Losing first day pick(s)will have an effect that last a few seasons. And I don't care how much you make a half million is a lot of coin. I think Godell has sent quite a strong message here.
Let's be honest; as much as some people wanted a forfeit there would be way to many unintended consequences if he had done that.

Robert Young
Milford

 
at 9/14/2007 9:05 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Let's be honest; as much as some people wanted a forfeit there would be way to many unintended consequences if he had done that."

Noone is asking for a forfeit... that was all a joke by Carson Palmer. It is rediculous that the Bengals get punished so extensively for off the field issues and the pretty boy Patriots get fined. That entire organization, including the coaches, has enough money to pay triple the fine handed out (see Forbes most valuable NFL teams). This is no more than a slap on the wrist.
I am wondering how far Goodell is going to take this punishment to only a select few attitude he has. He suspends players from the Bengals, Titans and Bears... but he lets coaches from other teams cheat (Pats) and he lets players from other teams ASSAULT other players (Joey Porter); and all they get is a slap on the wrist.
Goodell is a joke... WHO DEY!

 
at 9/14/2007 10:37 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'll admit in hindsight my above post was wrong. I just read Belichick's response and it is a crock. He must be a Clinton supporter because obviously he is unwilling to admit the truth. To say it was a wrong interpretation of rules is a slap in everyone's face.
Robert Young
Milford

 
at 9/14/2007 2:48 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

should have done in addition to what was already handed out:
should have mandated that the Patriots play out the entire 2007-08 season UNPLUGGED. No headsets. No QB radios. No cell phones. NADA. Zilch. At least when they play the Jets the next time, if not for all or half the season. Let's see how much of a genius Belicheat is without all his gadgets to rely on.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs


Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck

Advertisement