Get well soon
It doesn't look like Mark will be returning this week. Bulging disks can be quite painful, and the doc has ordered rest. So wish him well with your comments.
Meanwhile, we'll do our best to cover in his absence. You can check out Shannon Russell's daily story on Landon Johnson here. Robert Geathers, deservedly, got a lot of attention in the locker room after the Bengals' defense-influenced win Monday, but it was Johnson who finished with a team-high 11 tackles. His 34-yard rumble into the end zone in the second half might have been the game's most exciting play until the final interception:
Johnson was part of a Bengals defense that forced four fumbles and nabbed two interceptions, and the linebacker emerged from the group as an individual force to be reckoned with.
He started with a recovery of a Steve McNair fumble in the first quarter, marking the first of three straight fumbles on Ravens possessions. The Bengals took over on the Ravens' 41-yard line, but the possession ended with a missed 53-yard field goal attempt by Shayne Graham.
Johnson was just getting started. After Robert Geathers sacked McNair for an 8-yard loss in the third quarter, Johnson corralled the ball in midair and returned it 34 yards for a touchdown and a 19-10 Bengals lead.
I had a friend, a big Bengals fan, call me at home yesterday. He was thrilled with the way the Bengals defense looked Monday. I concurred that the defense, particularly Johnson, rose up when it was required. I still maintained, though, that it's a risky way to play, relying on a previously inconsistent defense to win games. For the moment, I conceded that 1-0 is 1-0 and that's all that really matters. Until the next game.
5 Comments:
Dustin, you can only beat what's put in front of you. The defense stood up and was counted on a day when the offense paid the price for several changes on the OL.
Let's take one game at a time. The best team in the AFC North last season are 0-1, that's what the record books show.
Bengals? 1-0!
I was pleasently surprised to see the defense rise to the challenge especially on the final goal line stand. Throughout the game they played with great intensity and our new look D-line was quicker off the block. My concern continues to be with the O-line. I think the loss of Steinbach and Brahm is going to be a bigger factor than anyone has really yet to mention. Any thoughts?
Braham was already lost. The Bengals had him for one and half games all of last year, so I think any adaptation that needed to take place at center has happened. As for Steinbach, we need to remember that the Bengals have more depth at O-line than any other position. Whit and Andrews start on almost all NFL teams, but alas there is only room for one on the line assuming Levi gets back into the game. That is a good problem to have.
the wishes for a speedy recovery are just overfilling this thread, aren't they?
Could be people are still in shock that someone actually posts and maintains a blog for a change, and that the someone doing it actually interjects some personality into the forum. I think the only time Mark ever did that was his weak attempts at political commentary which were completely innaproprriate for a Bengals blog. Could we trade Mark to the Post for $2.35 and a font to be named later?
It has been nice to have interesting, timely information on this blog. Maybe they'll keep Dustin on the beat full time!
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home