*

*
Bengals
Mark Curnutte offers the latest on the Cincinnati Bengals


Mark Curnutte started covering the Bengals and the NFL for The Enquirer in 2000. He previously wrote about urban affairs and other social issues for the Enquirer. He won the prestigious 1994 Unity Award from Lincoln University (Missouri) for "A Polite Silence," a seven-day series about race relations in Greater Cincinnati. He also has worked as an assistant features editor and features writer at The News & Observer in Raleigh, N.C. Curnutte is second vice president and a three-year board member of the Professional Football Writers of America (PFWA). He is a 1984 Miami University graduate.

Powered by Blogger

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Bengals clinging to 21-17 lead

At the two-minute warning, with 1:58 left, the Bengals are up 21-17. Seattle is at the Cincinnati 45-yard line. It is third and 10.

The Bengals made an excellent play on first down, almost coming up with a game-changing turnover on a tipped pass by tackle Michael Myers. Matt Hasselbeck caught the deflection and started to run before fumbling.

The play was not one that could be challenged.


5 Comments:

at 9/23/2007 7:06 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blown call my ref cost the game. Good job NFL, create a rule that even replay can't be used to make the right call

 
at 9/23/2007 7:33 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another choke job by the Bungles. Special teams reminds me of 1993. This team really stinks, the season is basically over.

 
at 9/23/2007 8:28 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

That call could have been challenged.
Marvin Lewis does not know the rules.
He is not allowed to challenge the fumble, but he could have challenged the catch. Would have resulted in a 10 yard loss, 2nd and 20 for Seattle

 
at 9/23/2007 9:11 PM Blogger Greg C. said...

That was either the second time the refs have misunderstood what ruling Marvin was trying to challenge at a critical juncture of the game, or Marvin has no idea what he can and cannot challenge on certain plays.

 
at 9/24/2007 8:46 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bottom line is, replay is supposed to be there as an oversight to correct a blown call. It should not be a game of semantics. Refs should get the damn call right in the first place anyway, not use replay as their crutch, and the really sad part is that had that play taken three seconds longer, it would have been reviewed AUTOMATICALLY!. And it would have resulted in a penalty had they zebras gotten it right, because Hasselbeck is not allowed to catch his own pass.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs


Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck

Advertisement